<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big 6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/</link>
	<description>Tips &#038; Tricks for Dreamhosters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:48:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-8208</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/#comment-8208</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that the way webhosting.info and similar sites compute their stats is biased towards a particular type of host. They mostly seem to base their measurements on domains having a particular set of nameservers.

There are a lot of big hosts which do a lot of reselling, provide private nameservers to their customers, or do other stuff which webhosting.info (and, to a lesser extent, Netcraft) don&#039;t really account for AFAIK. There are some obvious big companies missing from this list (Verio comes to mind), and it&#039;s mostly because of that. Netcraft&#039;s measurements are a little smarter, but they are also more protective of their data.

Also keep in mind that number of domains doesn&#039;t necessarily equate with revenue - there are many outfits which are larger in terms of revenue, but smaller in terms of # of hosted domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that the way webhosting.info and similar sites compute their stats is biased towards a particular type of host. They mostly seem to base their measurements on domains having a particular set of nameservers.</p>
<p>There are a lot of big hosts which do a lot of reselling, provide private nameservers to their customers, or do other stuff which webhosting.info (and, to a lesser extent, Netcraft) don&#8217;t really account for AFAIK. There are some obvious big companies missing from this list (Verio comes to mind), and it&#8217;s mostly because of that. Netcraft&#8217;s measurements are a little smarter, but they are also more protective of their data.</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that number of domains doesn&#8217;t necessarily equate with revenue &#8211; there are many outfits which are larger in terms of revenue, but smaller in terms of # of hosted domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-8207</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/#comment-8207</guid>
		<description>Only if you assume that it&#039;s one domain per person.  I&#039;m guessing the average is more like five or ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if you assume that it&#8217;s one domain per person.  I&#8217;m guessing the average is more like five or ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Linden</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-8206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2007/10/30/the-big-6-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh/#comment-8206</guid>
		<description>Pretty cool. So if you look at the blog comments when things go down, and say 50 people complain. That&#039;s only 0.008% LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty cool. So if you look at the blog comments when things go down, and say 50 people complain. That&#8217;s only 0.008% LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.455 seconds -->
