<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPU minute restrictions removed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/</link>
	<description>Tips &#038; Tricks for Dreamhosters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:48:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the blogging &#187; Dreamhost not so dreamy</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator>the blogging &#187; Dreamhost not so dreamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/#comment-2166</guid>
		<description>[...] Dreamhost is very vague about CPU resource utilization on their shared hosts, and I don&#8217;t know how many other customers I share happy.dreamhost.com with, but I&#8217;m confident that if my website were serving 24 page views per second, I would be adversely affecting the performance of the shared server, so the high bandwidth limit LOOKS like a great deal, but the type of website I host is unlikely to ever be able to use it without grinding the poor shared server to a halt, a scenario that looks suspiciously like what&#8217;s happening right now on happy! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dreamhost is very vague about CPU resource utilization on their shared hosts, and I don&#8217;t know how many other customers I share happy.dreamhost.com with, but I&#8217;m confident that if my website were serving 24 page views per second, I would be adversely affecting the performance of the shared server, so the high bandwidth limit LOOKS like a great deal, but the type of website I host is unlikely to ever be able to use it without grinding the poor shared server to a halt, a scenario that looks suspiciously like what&#8217;s happening right now on happy! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Just so you know, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/03/22/1and1-sucks/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;popular wordpress blog&lt;/a&gt; running the standard WP script with caching will still use what dreamhost considers to be too much CPU.  Yet, now on dedicated hosting with a 3 GHz Pentium 4 and a Gig of Ram, it&#039;s running smoothly.  In all reality, Dreamhost cannot offer a service guarantee of uptime without regards to CPU usage.  If you get too big, they&#039;ll cut you off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know, a <a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/03/22/1and1-sucks/" rel="nofollow">popular wordpress blog</a> running the standard WP script with caching will still use what dreamhost considers to be too much CPU.  Yet, now on dedicated hosting with a 3 GHz Pentium 4 and a Gig of Ram, it&#8217;s running smoothly.  In all reality, Dreamhost cannot offer a service guarantee of uptime without regards to CPU usage.  If you get too big, they&#8217;ll cut you off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>As an overall goal with these changes, we are trying to avoid the situation where we promise big allowances that you can&#039;t manage to use.  As you can see from the wiki history, we used to take a &quot;60 cpu minute per day&quot; approach to this, but we have now made the decision not to pester people about high usage until it&#039;s actually impacting the machine.  There&#039;s no numeric line that gets drawn anymore, it is a purpose-based line now:  Are you or aren&#039;t you interrupting service for other customers?  We feel this is a problem we can solve through balancing our machine loads more intelligently.

Of course, if you run a script that&#039;s just so incredibly abusive that it is crashing the machine repeatedly, we will still have to take that offline.  That is still against TOS and hasn&#039;t changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an overall goal with these changes, we are trying to avoid the situation where we promise big allowances that you can&#8217;t manage to use.  As you can see from the wiki history, we used to take a &#8220;60 cpu minute per day&#8221; approach to this, but we have now made the decision not to pester people about high usage until it&#8217;s actually impacting the machine.  There&#8217;s no numeric line that gets drawn anymore, it is a purpose-based line now:  Are you or aren&#8217;t you interrupting service for other customers?  We feel this is a problem we can solve through balancing our machine loads more intelligently.</p>
<p>Of course, if you run a script that&#8217;s just so incredibly abusive that it is crashing the machine repeatedly, we will still have to take that offline.  That is still against TOS and hasn&#8217;t changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unofficial DreamHost Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DreamHost Newsletter - June 2006</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Unofficial DreamHost Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DreamHost Newsletter - June 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2006/06/01/cpu-minute-restrictions-removed/#comment-604</guid>
		<description>[...] Unofficial DreamHost Blog Tips &amp; Tricks for Dreamhosters      &#171; DreamHost Test New Email Logins CPU minute restrictions removed &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unofficial DreamHost Blog Tips &#38; Tricks for Dreamhosters      &laquo; DreamHost Test New Email Logins CPU minute restrictions removed &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.525 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
