<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DreamHost 2005 &#8211; Year in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2005/12/31/dreamhost-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2005/12/31/dreamhost-year-in-review/</link>
	<description>Tips &#038; Tricks for Dreamhosters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:48:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2005/12/31/dreamhost-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/?p=21#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I would really like to see some type of VPS plan or higher CPU limits. There needs to be an in-between for a shared account and a dedicated machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like to see some type of VPS plan or higher CPU limits. There needs to be an in-between for a shared account and a dedicated machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2005/12/31/dreamhost-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Minh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/?p=21#comment-13</guid>
		<description>As a current Dreamhost customer I love the idea of more bandwidth and space, however I feel like DreamHost is saturating the market with these &quot;insane&quot; plans because they know that their customers will be limited to the clock cycles on their server&#039;s cpus. This sucks for me as a customer because, while I love DreamHost, the service that I signed up for a year ago isn&#039;t the same service I get now (it has been degraded).

I would be willing to pay a bit more for shared servers that aren&#039;t being massively bombarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a current Dreamhost customer I love the idea of more bandwidth and space, however I feel like DreamHost is saturating the market with these &#8220;insane&#8221; plans because they know that their customers will be limited to the clock cycles on their server&#8217;s cpus. This sucks for me as a customer because, while I love DreamHost, the service that I signed up for a year ago isn&#8217;t the same service I get now (it has been degraded).</p>
<p>I would be willing to pay a bit more for shared servers that aren&#8217;t being massively bombarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unofficial DreamHost Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PHP Year in Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.dreamhosters.com/2005/12/31/dreamhost-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Unofficial DreamHost Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PHP Year in Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dreamhosters.com/?p=21#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] Unofficial DreamHost Blog Tips &amp; Tricks for Dreamhosters      &#171; DreamHost Year in Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unofficial DreamHost Blog Tips &#38; Tricks for Dreamhosters      &laquo; DreamHost Year in Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.147 seconds -->
